Police report taken by Gregozek as to – April 12, 2008 incident- Statement by notaro
On April 12th 2008 Notaro was standing outside Largo. At approximately 2130 hours, Notaro was standing outside with owner, Mark Flanagan Notaro saw Spitzberg and her sister running towards her.She ran inside and security closed the doors.
Spitzberg pounded on the doors and yelled, “where gonna get that fucking dyke!” Security kept the doors closed for over an hour.
The police were called but Spitzberg had left before they arrived.
. April 12 Incident - as told in her affidavit to get temporary restraining order- under oath
The next night I performed at Largo was April 12th , 2008., I was standing outside the club with the owner Mark Flanagan. I noticed Alisa and her sister, Lauren Spitzberg, about fifteen feet away from my right. They ran towards me and lunged at me, and I ran inside before they could make physical contact. They were not allowed entrance into the club, and Mark Flanagan called the police.
Alisa and Lauren went around to the back door, and for an hour and a half proceeded to verbally abuse Mark Flanagan and Michael Griffee, scream at the top of their lungs, and bang on the door.
They ran back and forth from the front to back entrance yelling, “were going to get that dyke.” They left close to 11 p.m before the police could come.
Notaro’s testimony Transcript April 12th - In order to secure a permanent restraining order
MS. NOTARO: THE FOLLOWING SATURDAY NIGHT I WAS PERFORMING AGAIN, AND I WAS OUTSIDE OF THE VENUE TALKING TO
THE OWNER OF THE CLUB, AND I LOOKED TO MY RIGHT AND ALISA AND HER SISTER RIGHT AS I TURNED TO MY RIGHT WERE RUNNING DOWN THE SIDEWALK TOWARDS ME. I WENT INSIDE. THE OWNER SHUT THE DOOR, WOULDN'T LET THEM IN.AT THAT POINT THEY HAD TO LOCK THE DOOR BECAUSE THEY WERE KICKING AND BEATING THE DOOR SAYING WE'RE GOING
TO GET THAT FUCKING DIKE.
THE OWNER OF THE CLUB, AND I LOOKED TO MY RIGHT AND ALISA AND HER SISTER RIGHT AS I TURNED TO MY RIGHT WERE RUNNING DOWN THE SIDEWALK TOWARDS ME. I WENT INSIDE. THE OWNER SHUT THE DOOR, WOULDN'T LET THEM IN.AT THAT POINT THEY HAD TO LOCK THE DOOR BECAUSE THEY WERE KICKING AND BEATING THE DOOR SAYING WE'RE GOING
TO GET THAT FUCKING DIKE.
AND THEN THEY WENT AROUND TO THE BACK. THAT'S WHEN AGAIN MY BACK DOOR GUY FROM LARGO, THE HAD TO LOCK THE BACK DOOR, AND THEY CONTINUED DOING THAT FOR AN HOUR AND A HALF. AND THEN KEVIN, WHO I'VE ALSO
BROUGHT, WAS SOMEBODY THAT WAS AT THE VENUE THAT NIGHT, ANJUST;SAYING: "WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT FUCKING DIKE. SHE BETTER WATCH HER BACK.
BROUGHT, WAS SOMEBODY THAT WAS AT THE VENUE THAT NIGHT, ANJUST;SAYING: "WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT FUCKING DIKE. SHE BETTER WATCH HER BACK.
Notaro statement to Neil Spector - investigator for the public defender.
Notaro said a few nights later, Alisa once again showed up at Largo. This time she brought her sister along with her. When Alisa first showed up on this second night Notaro stated that she had been outside and talking with its owner Mark Flanagan Notaro said that Flanagan told her to immediately get inside the club and he would take care of Alisa and her sister. Notaro also advised that the police also showed up that evening at Largo but she believed that Alisa and her Sister had already left Largo. Prior to the police arriving there. She said that she carried on with her performance that evening but she advised that she was in a “paranoid state” throughout the evening..
Julius Quinn Robert’s statement affidavit (doorman at the dime bar very closeby and witnessed any activity at front door)
I am the door guy at the dime which is no more than 16 feet away from where largo once was. I remember the day in question and remember nothing happen(ing) I even
talked to the ladies for a minute or two and invited them inside the dime for a drink. These ladies are good people to be around and everything that this woman said is a lie.
On September 10th 2009, Boags ordered all the documents associated with the the alleged arrest and with an "unknown" incident number.
We have to assume he wondered why Gregozek hasn't provided him such a number. But Gregozek does provide one incident number that he claims the unnamed Officers have supplied.
A year into the criminal prosecution, a new prosecutor is assigned the case. His name is Martin Boags(give his name a google to see how his moral turpitude problems unbenched his father, Charles Boags)
So On September 11th 2009, I won't take any plea offers still, the evidence is in that this is all a sham, and the competency scheme hits a snag when for whatever reason, Judge Samantha Jessner, orders it be stopped. The competency scheme now seemingly kaput, Martin Boags and the prosecution can do three things 1) dismiss the charges and face a civil suit 2) find another dirty way to win at all costs 3) try to win at trial.
In this scheme of things it appears Martin Boags is somewhat in the dark, and so he decides he will take it to trial. For the first time, and after four or more prosecutors have failed to order any records, Boags orders the documents, we can presume, he is sure will help him win. Arrest records cause it says there was an arrest(though there was none and that is another story,) and the records that Notaro, Mark Flanagan, Micheal Griffee, and Notaro say exists. Detective John Gregozek does not include any incident or police report number so we can guess Martin Boags is a little confused.
Let's revisit just want he'd want ordered based on Gregozek's report-
Wow security kept doors closed for over an hour(in another version Notaro would put it at 6 hours. In one, it was four but never mind...) So a whole packed club... possibly hundreds of calls to the police. But let's just trust Gregozek , Michael Griffee, Mark Flanagan and Notaro when they claim police were called by Mark Flanagan and arrived before the Spitzberg or Spitzer sister could be ... apprehended... arrested... what we'll never know.
He puts in a rush order on September 14th 2009 or according to this - a V Castro requested it. He requests they mark the number on any CD or document they send. He claims that the trial is to be August 12 2009 and it better get to him immediately. August 12th? HMMMM HMMMMM CHILLS - if you know what will happen on that day. He lists an incident number that doesn't exist and that is listed for another date by Gregozek. That too was a falsified number with no accompanying reports of any kind. in this case aside no reports exist, aside of those manufactured by John Gregozek and signed off by Jeffrey Dunn(the supervisor and head of the Threat Management Unit)
He gets this in response:
So as of September 14th 2009, City attorney Martin Boags is cognizant of some very very very suspicious things going on with the case, that just fell in his lap.
1) His "Victim" is lying in a particularly disturbing way. Mathilde "Tig" Notaro is making claims that had any effort been made on the part part of the defense attorneys - could have easily been shown as a perjury and making false claims to the police, and in doing so this prosecution is based on a void order - there is no valid restraining order and the case must be dismissed.
2) Michael Griffee made these same claims and said he was right there when he saw Mark Flanagan make that call. So he's lying for whatever reason and did so under penalty of perjury. So we likely have a tampering with witness situation or Griffee has been promised something or some other nefarious reason to lie under oath.
3) What is up with Detective John Gregozek. At this point, he has written up many reports and four search warrants that all say that he has vetted Notaro's claims and they all turned out to be true and therefore he presented them as fact to get exigent circumstance search warrants, and as of this date - three criminal charges against me. As you will see, Boags would add four more charges before he'd be mysteriously removed from the case.
4) I have been not pleaing and fighting with all I had that all along this has been a void order, based on fraud on the court and some level of conspiracy with John Gregozek.
This proves it ,and so what does Martin Boags do?
To be continued....
And, here are two links that are very relevant to why Notaro is starring in an Amazon Series rather than being on probation, after serving time, and why John Gregozek is doing fine still and Martin Boags is not in jail and disbarred and on and on and on..
( Notaro's lawfirm at the time and in constant contact with the prosecution according to public defender Franica Tawn) Here's just some evidence of that contact. documents only handed over for a civil suit that followed the judges and prosecutors dismissal of all charges.
And in order to get Notaro out of a subpoena at the start of the case - this is all it took
( Not written by me. I wish I could be that succinct and linear. But, that blog summarizes why John Gregozek acted throughout case 8CA10541 as a errand boy.
No comments:
Post a Comment