Tig Notar AKA the shark that now bites the hand of Louis CK -One Lie all lies but not if you have Kroll and Marty Singer on your side

Police report taken by Gregozek as to – April 12, 2008 incident-  Statement by notaro

On April 12^th 2008 Notaro was standing outside Largo. At approximately 2130 hours, Notaro was standing outside with owner, Mark Flanagan Notaro saw Spitzberg and her sister running towards her.She ran inside and security closed the doors.

Spitzberg pounded on the doors and yelled, “where gonna get that fucking dyke!” Security kept the doors closed for over an hour.

The police were called but Spitzberg had left before they arrived.

. April 12 Incident - as told in her affidavit to get temporary restraining order- under oath

The next night I performed at Largo was April 12^th , 2008., I was standing outside the club with the owner Mark Flanagan. I noticed Alisa and her sister, Lauren Spitzberg, about fifteen feet away from my right. They ran towards me and lunged at me, and I ran inside before they could make physical contact. They were not allowed entrance into the club, and Mark Flanagan called the police.

Alisa and Lauren went around to the back door, and for an hour and a half proceeded to verbally abuse Mark Flanagan and Michael Griffee, scream at the top of their lungs, and bang on the door.

They ran back and forth from the front to back entrance yelling, “were going to get that dyke.” They left close to 11 p.m before the police could come.

Notaro’s testimony Transcript April 12^{th - In order to secure a permanent restraining order} 

MS. NOTARO:  THE FOLLOWING SATURDAY NIGHT I WAS   PERFORMING AGAIN, AND I WAS OUTSIDE OF THE VENUE TALKING TO
  THE OWNER OF THE CLUB, AND I LOOKED TO MY RIGHT AND ALISA AND HER SISTER RIGHT AS I TURNED TO MY RIGHT WERE RUNNING  DOWN THE SIDEWALK TOWARDS ME.  I WENT INSIDE.  THE OWNER  SHUT THE DOOR, WOULDN'T LET THEM IN.AT THAT POINT THEY HAD TO LOCK THE DOOR BECAUSE THEY WERE KICKING AND BEATING THE DOOR SAYING WE'RE GOING
TO GET THAT FUCKING DIKE. 

AND THEN THEY WENT AROUND TO THE  BACK.  THAT'S WHEN AGAIN MY BACK DOOR GUY FROM LARGO, THE HAD TO LOCK THE BACK DOOR, AND THEY CONTINUED DOING THAT FOR AN HOUR AND A HALF.  AND THEN KEVIN, WHO I'VE ALSO
BROUGHT, WAS SOMEBODY THAT WAS AT THE VENUE THAT NIGHT, ANJUST;SAYING:  "WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT FUCKING DIKE.  SHE BETTER WATCH HER BACK.

Notaro statement to Neil Spector - investigator for the public defender.

Notaro said a few nights later, Alisa once again showed up at Largo. This time she brought her sister along with her. When Alisa first showed up on this second night Notaro stated that she had been outside and talking with its owner Mark Flanagan Notaro said that Flanagan told her to immediately get inside the club and he would take care of Alisa and her sister. Notaro also advised that the police also showed up that evening at Largo but she believed that Alisa and her Sister had already left Largo. Prior to the police arriving there. She said that she carried on with her performance that evening but she advised that she was in a “paranoid state” throughout the evening..

Julius Quinn Robert’s statement affidavit (doorman at the dime bar very closeby and witnessed any activity at front door)

I am the door guy at the dime which is no more than 16 feet away from where largo once was. I remember the day in question and remember nothing happen(ing) I even

talked to the ladies for a minute or two and invited them inside the dime for a drink. These ladies are good people to be around and everything that this woman said is a lie.

On September 10th  2009, Boags ordered all the documents associated with the the alleged arrest and with an "unknown" incident number. 




We have to assume he wondered why Gregozek hasn't provided him such a number. But Gregozek does provide one incident number that he claims the unnamed Officers have supplied.





A year into the criminal prosecution, a new prosecutor is assigned the case. His name is Martin Boags(give his name a google to see how his moral turpitude problems unbenched his father, Charles Boags)


So  On September 11th 2009, I won't take any plea offers still, the evidence is in that this is all a sham, and the competency scheme hits a snag when for whatever reason, Judge Samantha Jessner, orders it be stopped. The competency scheme now seemingly kaput, Martin Boags and the prosecution can do three things 1) dismiss the charges and face a civil suit 2) find another dirty way to win at all costs 3) try to win at trial.

In this scheme of things it appears Martin Boags is somewhat in the dark, and so he decides he will take it to trial. For the first time, and after four or more prosecutors have failed to order any records, Boags orders the documents, we can presume, he is sure will help him win. Arrest records cause it says there was an arrest(though there was none and that is another story,) and the records that Notaro, Mark Flanagan, Micheal Griffee, and Notaro say exists. Detective John Gregozek does not include any incident or police report number so we can guess Martin Boags is a little confused. 

Let's revisit just want he'd want ordered based on Gregozek's report- 




Wow security kept doors closed for over an hour(in another version Notaro would put it at 6 hours. In one, it was four but never mind...) So a whole packed club... possibly hundreds of calls to the police. But let's just trust Gregozek , Michael Griffee, Mark Flanagan and Notaro when they claim police were called by Mark Flanagan and arrived before the Spitzberg or Spitzer sister could be ... apprehended... arrested... what we'll never know.


He puts in a rush order on September 14th 2009 or according to this - a V Castro requested it. He requests they mark the number on any CD or document they send. He claims that the trial is to be August 12 2009 and it better get to him immediately. August 12th? HMMMM HMMMMM CHILLS - if you know what will happen on that day.  He lists an incident number that doesn't exist and that is listed for another date by Gregozek. That too was a falsified number with no accompanying reports of any kind.  in this case aside no reports exist, aside  of those manufactured by John Gregozek and signed off by Jeffrey Dunn(the supervisor and head of the Threat Management Unit)

He gets this in response:

So as of September 14th 2009, City attorney Martin Boags is cognizant of some very very very suspicious things going on with the case, that just fell in his lap. 


1) His "Victim" is lying in a particularly disturbing way. Mathilde "Tig" Notaro is making claims that had any effort been made on the part part of the defense attorneys - could have easily been shown as a perjury and making false claims to the police, and in doing so this prosecution is based on a void order -  there is no valid restraining order and the case must be dismissed. 

2) Michael Griffee made these same claims and said he was right there when he saw Mark Flanagan make that call. So he's lying for whatever reason and did so under penalty of perjury. So we likely have a tampering with witness situation or Griffee has been promised something or some other nefarious reason to lie under oath.

3) What is up with Detective John Gregozek. At this point, he has written up many reports and four search warrants that all say that he has vetted Notaro's claims and they all turned out to be true and therefore he presented them as fact to get exigent circumstance search warrants, and as of this date - three criminal charges against me. As you will see, Boags would add four more charges before he'd be mysteriously removed from the case. 

4) I have been not pleaing and fighting with all I had that all along this has been a void order, based on fraud on the court and some level of conspiracy with John Gregozek. 

This proves it ,and so what does Martin Boags do?


To be continued....

And, here are two links that are very relevant to why Notaro is starring in an Amazon Series rather than being on probation, after serving time, and why John Gregozek is doing fine still and Martin Boags is not in jail and disbarred and on and on and on..

http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/02/marty-singer-hollywood-lawyer 

( Notaro's lawfirm at the time and in constant contact with the prosecution according to public defender Franica Tawn) Here's just some evidence of that contact. documents only handed over for a civil suit that followed the judges and prosecutors dismissal of all charges.

And in order to get Notaro out of a subpoena at the start of the case - this is all it took

https://losangeleslessconfidential.wordpress.com/2013/10/31/marty-singer-and-the-pelican-anthony-pellicanno-lives-on-through-randy-mehringer-and-marty-singer-of-famed-lavely-and-singer/

( Not written by me. I wish I could be that succinct and linear. But, that blog summarizes why John Gregozek acted throughout case 8CA10541 as a errand boy.

Shout out to the jurors no. 2 in case 8CA10541- H Randolph Moore is an angel

A reader in Georgia is looking up my name. Maybe my " I prefer to stay anonymous"juror is in hiding somewhere. I don't blame them for being frightened.
  I'm working on other things now and I doubt I'll be coming here often but I just want the jurors of case 8CA10541 in the CCB or Clara Folz courthouse whatever to know that kind of a liar Katie Ford is and what kind of City attorney Los Angeles has . Katie Ford lied to you and to the judge and she follows a long line of city attorneys who have no shame and will do anything to advance their sad dreams. She left such a trail of lies in the "trial breif" that she has made my life easy but you didn''t get to see that. You didnt' get to see anything but a spectacle, really.  But, I'm sure you remember the mouse monster saying, " You sue a lot of people, don't you Ms. Spitzberg." Well, Jurors, go see how true that is. In my 40 years I've had many reasons and valid lawsuits I could have filed but I never did . That Katie Ford lie is one of the least serious but still why lie like that if you have any case.
I'm going to show you what  a vicious and pathetic liar Mathilde Tig Notaro is soon too but that requires me to access my old computer and I've been too tired to connect wires etc. I will also show you what a liar Martha Kelly, Jackie Kashian, and Jeff Klinger is.
But, for today It is my duty to just tell you that what Ford told you about her dropping charges to make your life easier or to save money is a lie of such absurd proportions and then when someone asked " So what happens now." and the evil Katie Ford told you the judge dismissed it .... cause he didn't want to spend more money... Well, Jurors, I don't have much respect for your reasoning skills, to be honest. How so many could conclude and be ready to convict on such illogical conclusions is very scary.
Only one had common sense , but the others should give a thought or do research on these matters , and they should  know that when you were gone the judge indeed commented on what a long and expensive trial it was and did give a gentle voiced lecture to the prosecution about how it was thier fault and that he thought that they would never successfully prosecute me on it and that he thought it was a civil matter than never should have made it's way to a criminal court. You see, that judge is the exception, and that judge is a just, sharp, and fair man. And, that judge figured out that this was all a retaliation for daring to sue Marty Singer or Allison Siever's client.... The threat management who took on such a case when they never had any reason to and they never investigated(despite me begging them to and supplying witnesses) is also represented by Marty Singer's firmm. That is why I got such a patently false restraining order granted in the first place. So, Katie Ford(and her new BFF whose name we won't mention) when she told you that the judge dismissed it all probably committed more malpractice. I'll find out.  And, I doubt the judge would appreciate her lying about dropping 4 charges for their benefit. In fact, if you didn't hear me that day - those 4 charges were too obvious a part of this very obvious malicious prosecution and those charges were added strictly to intimidate me into pleading to thier bullshit diversion plea. Jail failed, competency barbarities failed, harrasment failed, and that was all they had left in thier arsenal but it of course had to be dropped. If you just knew what those charges were and how embarrassinly transparent they were.

I've let it go that 11 failed in their duty to the truth, but I do think it is my duty for those 11 to not leave that godforsaken courthouse with such false impressions of the city attorney and the los angeles injustice system. I am indeed earnest and relentless about my promise to make sure that others don't have to endure what me and my family endured.

the city attorney of los angeles spends tax payer money very unwisely

My god, the city of Los Angeles must have money to burn: Today on the blog - searches for Martin Boags and Felise Cohen Kalpakian. FYI those are two deeply grotesque characters who saw fit to waste California's money to satisfy their own sad bruised egos. They saw fit to jail someone and lie like maniacs to judges and in general because I simply stated the truth about their vileness issues.

We won't get into the new one yet because that is too absurd and surreal to begin with.

They have all gotten off very easy, and should stop obsessively checking my blog. It's highly unseemly.

Jennifer Abrahams Waxler, Martin Boags, Felise Cohen Kalpakian - you are  DISGUSTING. you are more disgusting than your freak false victim, Tig Mathilde Notaro. Only that bunch of corrupt judges is more disgusting. DISGUSTING.


Update: Three years later- Martin Boags appears to have been the recipient of some truly astounding Karma. My god, it's uncanny.