GNS- Free to write this part 2
Dear
Open Salonners,
I had a very
enlightening yet painful discovery last week. The sham bogus hoax
appeals decision is the reason I have not had an easy time getting
the
"civil rememedies" that the judge in my trial suggested I seek. I spoke to a lawyer ,and this is what he told me, and I think he's right.
"civil rememedies" that the judge in my trial suggested I seek. I spoke to a lawyer ,and this is what he told me, and I think he's right.
Hard to get into
how I was jailed for no legal basis while the oral hearing was set to
take place. I know that Allison Sievers of Lavely and Singer
and John Gregozek are behind that but it all sounds
so unbelievable when one is sane. The appeals posts have been
getting hits daily and so this is some attempt to get the jury of my
peers to see it - as that right was denied me. Also, I'm having a PM
correspondence with a lovely new OSer and it's driving me crazy what
they did with my name, and what a collossal lie is being passed off
as truth. If this doesn't get a comment or a rate I still won't
regret it - as it will get read - Desperate times etc.
Also, there is a
good chance I could end up like Montalvo(see below) and so I like to
feel as if at least one witness will one day step forward and wonder
if Fernsy's death was really accidental. Hmmm. ummm. oh.
My sister did
this - she is convinced this is the best way to present it.
Questions or comments very appreciated but not expected.
From
Appeals decision posted online:
Both Notaro and
Spitzberg are performers at comedy clubs. On May 5, 2008, Notaro
filed a petition for a restraining order to stop harassment by
Spitzberg. The petition, supported
by Notaro's declaration, sought protection for Notaro and three
friends who lived with her. On May 5, 2008,
the trial court issued a temporary restraining order against
Spitzberg and an order to show cause setting the matter for a hearing
on May 28, 2008. Spitzberg filed an
answer on May 27, 2008. Her answer responded in detail to the
allegations of the petition. The petition and answer provided the
following information:
In
August 2007, Notaro and Willen were in a café having coffee when
Spitzberg approached their table and began to yell insults at them,
"including `fucking dyke,' `ugly,' `cunt,' and `bitch.'"
They ignored Spitzberg, who followed them outside, became more
belligerent, and "shoved/pushed" Notaro. Spitzberg denied
pushing Notaro. Who are the three
“friends’ Notaro lists
Comedians named Tom Sharpe, Christopher
Fairbainks and Kjell Bjorgen?
Who are they?
Three strangers that Notaro put on both
the temporary order and permanent order- as living with her.
Why
would she put them as protected people on this order?
Because, under penalty of perjury. she
says they all live with her.
Did they
live with her then, or since this order was granted by the
dishonorable Judge Gerald Rosenberg.
No. They didn't live with her, and
2 of them, for sure, never did.
Did anyone of these men
testify in any subsequent hearing and were they even mentioned?
No
Did the public defender’s
investigator or the private lawyers Spitzbergs had to hire ever make
any effort to confirm this?
No.
Why?
Only the lord knows, but it does seem
relevant that she is lying about such a thing.
Why would Notaro lie
about something like that?
There’s the problem. So much she will
do is senseless and bizarre. How can you explain malicious insanity?
Yet the threat management unit, and the city ,and then then the D.A
--did her bidding as if she was Queen Elizabeth..
Is
Notaro so rich and famous that she commands such treatment?
No. It’s all due to Nick
Kroll's connections and phone calls. He got her Lavely and Singer
and they and Kroll have an unholy alliance with Gregozek of the
Threat Management unit. It’s a mess up that led to an actual cover
up, and then an actual criminal and civil conspiracy. I was not
a conspiracy buff, and am not still, but conspiracies do happen.
The other detectives will try their
very best to disconnect from this case, from the start. Ample
evidence available that Gregozek was retaliating for the
internal affairs complaint made in December 22nd 2008
against him for lying in reports and his flagrant failure to
investigate. He and the other TMU cops knew early on ,and they
still let this happen.
Sam C. Who is he?
He worked and still works at
the Tsumani coffee house in Silverlake, CA.(café mentioned in
the appellate decision.)
Did he work on August 29th
2007 the night Notaro alleges a major scene of verbal tirades and
physical violence( shove/push) took place?
Yes
Why is he important?
Because he is a “witness’ to the
only alleged incident of violence- that is the basis for the
appellate decision- and then many other terrible
decisions that will lead to epic amounts of damages. He
was right there in a tiny place and Notaro will keep changing her
story -but she will maintain all the way to trial- that a huge
spectacle happened that night. Stephanie Willen will completely
change up the story too, but she will keep repeating this lie till
the bitter end. She since has gotten jobs from this Tig and has
been rewarded with trips, jobs, and gifts for her lies. The appeal
court will write that Notaro and others testified to this physical
violence. But, that is not true. Even Willen doesn’t lie about that
in a court of law. Though she will lie about it to police and then to
Martin Boags and Katie Ford when it is proceeding to trial.
When
did Spitzberg seek Sam C. out and why?
In October of 2008 - to void the
order and prove it was a fraud, as she was ruined in the comedy world
for no valid reason .She found out that Notaro was even crazier and
more evil than first imagined.
Did
Judge Rosenberg allow her legal right to set aside the order if it
was based on Fraud?
No. He is corrupt. Truly, corrupt. Many
L.A judges are.
Would
Sam testify for the defense in a court of law under penalty of
perjury
Yes, according to the Public defender
representing me at trial- he was ready to do so with
enthusiasm.
What
does he say occurred on August 29th
2007?
That there was no activity or fight or
violence at all .
When was he scheduled to
testify for the defense?
Sometime in March 2010
Did the
police or the prosecution ever try talk to Sam C. from April 30th
2008 till March 2010?
No.
Did
Spitzberg mention his presence that night and that he was a
witness. And, if so when? Did she give them his affidavit and his
statement to the investigator?
Yes, Over and over again. Spitzberg
told John Gregozek and Hoffman in May of 2008, Jeffrey Dunn in
February of 2009 , Jennifer Waxler, city attorney via email and
motions on March 25th 2009
Felise Kalpakian and Waxler on
August 12th 2009 Martin Boags on September 11th
2009
Many Judges throughout(show
transcripts)
The public defender told Katie Ford in
March of 2010 if she didn’t already know – which she had to.
Was it easy to get a hold of
Sam C?
Very.
Was
there an oral hearing for this Appeal?
There was once scheduled for November
16th 2009, but the raid and the false arrest and the false
jailing made that impossible to attend and three days later the
ruling that was obtained by fraud, was mysteriously posted online.
Did the
threat management come and arrest Spitzberg and keep her jailed for
31 days while this hearing was to take place on November 16th
2009?
Yes
Were
there any charges or any probable cause to ever arrest or try
Spitzberg?
NONE
Is that
an objective opinion?
Yes. This is not in dispute. This was
done strictly so Spitzberg gets scared, and isn’t able to sue them
for the non stop mistakes, omissions, malice, negligence that she
uncovered. Spitzberg can and will sue for millions and they know it.
Is
this alleged incidence of violence used in bad faith throughout the 2
year malicious prosecution?
YES and to allow true barbarity to
occur.
Did
Spitzberg file an answer?
Yes. It was over 30 pages long
and conclusively showed that Notaro was a liar who was lying about
everything . This answer was UTTERLY disregarded by Judge Gerald
Rosenberg, and then by this Appeals Court. There really is something
very very wrong with these judges here -because they will say later
in this “opinion” that I testified extensively. I did not testify
at all because the judge didn’t let me. He would
not let me do anything and decided it based on only Notaro and her
lying witnesses testimony. He illegally had my witness removed.
I don’t know why these judges
are actually lying here. I’ll assume they were bamboozled by
Sievers and Gregozek or something. But, they make too many untrue
statements for it to be understandable. There is no mention of how
this Threat Management unit is involved or how none of their
reports(that show up later) are filed. This is a major omission
considering the facts.
On
the evening of April 7, 2008, after Notaro performed at Largo,
Spitzberg approached her and asked Notaro if she remembered her.
Notaro said that she remembered meeting her and that Spitzberg had
been aggressive and had pushed her. Notaro then said she did not want
to talk to Spitzberg and told Spitzberg to leave her alone. Spitzberg
became enraged. Notaro was fearful that the situation would escalate
and had Michael Griffee, the doorman at Largo, escort Spitzberg out
of the club.
Heidi
F
Who is
Heidi F?
Tig Notaro’s “brand” new agent
who came for the first time to see Tig notaro’s show on April 7th
, according to Notaro.
Why is she important?
She was talking to Notaro during all
versions of the alleged Verbal attacks that Notaro says occurred ,on
the night that Gregozek describes as the night Spitzberg made
verbal threats to Notaro. Notaro changes what was said or done by
Spitzberg in every version but she keeps putting this agent as an
eyewitness and in some version I am screaming and cursing and
standing over her and not letting her go and it goes on.
According to Heidi,
What did Notaro tell her about Spitzberg on April 7th
2008
b) She stated that Notaro told her on
April 7th 2008 , that Spitzberg had been stalking her for
a long time, and she was getting a restraining order against her.
What did Notaro say in an
affidavit for the Civil Suit much later on.
Notaro never saw or knew or heard
about Spitzberg and had no contact with her in the 9 months
since August 29th 2007 in Tsunami till seeing her and
having her removed on Apiril 7th 2008
What is the truth?
Spitzberg and Notaro had nothing to do
with eachother. But, Notaro has created a fantasy world, perhaps,
where Spitzberg is playing some role.
On May 5th
2008, Did Notaro put Heidi down as a witness on the Temp restraining
order forms.
Yes
Did Heidi come to testify at
the hearing on May 28th
2008
No
Did any of the witnesses
she listed on those paper and in her affidavit show up?
No.
Who did show up?
Wannabe comedians and a lowlife liar
who thought Notaro would be a good friend to have.
Did Notaro’s witnesses get
rewarded for their perjury?
Yes. All of them
Did Spitzberg tell the police,
and prosecution about Heidi F. and how she was a witness?
Yes.Repeatedly(show all
instances)
How is that proven?
By Spector, emails to hoffman,
dunn, Gregozek, letters to Waxler and Boags and in the transcripts of
many hearings – specifically to Judge Martinez- show
Did the police or prosecution
ever contact Ms. Feigin from April 30th 2008 till March 23rd 2010?
No
Is
it easy to get ahold of Ms. Feigin?
Yes. Very.
Did
Hunter Seidman, Notaro’s manager, call Ms. Feigin in early 2010 to
ask her why she was going to “testify for the other side?’
Yes.
Did
Public Defender, Alissa M, witness this witness intimidation?
Yes.
Was
Heidi Feigin willing to testify for the defense at trial?
Yes. All the witnesses stepped up to
the plate.
What would she say?
That Notaro lied, and none of what she
alleged that evening was remotely true.
Why doesn’t she end up coming
to testify?
The judge couldn’t let anything to do
with that order in. The pressure from the police and
prosecutors on him , and the fact that a fortune was already
spent on this. If I wasn’t exonerated I’d have to appeal because
this was very very unfair.
I was not given the opportunity to show
what criminally culpable liars Notaro, Willen, Gregozek and the rest
were, and are.
Did
this appeals court have that information when writing up this ...?
YES
Part 2
Notaro
performed again at Largo on April 12, 2008. When Notaro was standing
outside the club talking to the owner, she saw Spitzberg and her
sister running toward her.
Notaro ran inside before they could make physical contact with her.
The owner did not let
Spitzberg inside the club and called the police. Spitzberg
and her sister went to the club's back door, where they verbally
abused the owner and the doorman and yelled, "`We're going to
get that fucking dyke.'" Spitzberg
left the club before the police officers arrived.
According to Spitzberg, Largo's owner and another man at the back
door were abusive to her and her sister, and they returned their
insults. Spitzberg denied screaming or using obscenities.
Who is
Julius R?
Julius is a bouncer that works at the
Dime bar and was standing right there where the alleged “crimes’
took place on April 12th 2008.
Why is
he important?
He is a witnesses to the rampage
alleged by Mathilde Notaro that lasted an hour and a half outside of
Largo. He also can attest to whether the police came that night.
Has
Julius ever met The Spitzbergs before that night?
No
Did he
speak to the Spitzberg sisters that night, and if so what did he say
about that?
They are good people to talk to and
everything that woman(Notaro) said is a a lie.
What is Julius’s
R’s day job?
A parole officer.
When is his presence
first mentioned.
On May 7th 2008 when
Spitzberg tells John Gregozek and James Hoffman that she talked
to a Bouncer for awhile, and how he is one of many witnesses that can
show that Notaro is lying.
IS Julius R
mentioned throughout the prosecution of Spitzberg
Yes Spitzberg tells everyone to talk to
these Witnesses. She tells Gregozek, Spector, Waxler, Hoffman,
Dunn, Sgt Angela Lucie, Martin Boags, Ford, To FBI agents and to many
claiming to work for Internal affairs( because Spitzberg put in a
complaint against Gregozek for failing to investigate and filing
false affidavits on December 22nd 2008 and on March 11th
2009.)
What does Gregozek,
Hoffman, Defoe, and Dunn say at various times about being told to
please talk to the witnesses or get the videotape made by a comedian
on the Night of Apirl 7th?
“This is not a murder. “ “This is
too small for us. “. “We are not going to go to a coffee
shop to interview witnesses. “Get over it” “ Just get a
restraining order on her”
Really?
Yep.
Did any
police or prosecutor ever interview or even call Julius over the
almost two years they knew about him?
No.
In March
2010 when trial was set did the Public defender contact Julius?
Yes
Did he agree to come into
court, and be interviewed by both my public defender and the
prosecutor?
Yes.
Did he come into court?
Yes. In early March of 2010.
What did he say and what was he
willing to say under oath at trial?
None of what was alleged by any of
Notaro, or her witnesses , happened , and they were all liars.
Was He
on call for the defense for the “ month of March.”
Yes
Does Julius ever get to
testify for the defense?
No- same for all these witnesses.
Why? Because now after adding 7 charges
and having to drop 4 the prosecution is passionately trying to keep
anything about the fraudulent restaining order out. Though by law,
one must be able to “collaterally attack” such an order, if a
criminal charges is based on it. This doesn’t happen because the
prosecution has messed up so badly . Still they manage to get the
judge to rule that nothing pre May 2008 come in. The trial was a void
trial as it was went on despite a million things that by law would
make it a nullity. But, it kept going and though the prosecution LOST
big I was not able to do what I should have, by law, been able to do.
Does
Katie Ford , Los Angeles City attorney, disregard all the
evidence to show that Notaro is a fraud and the worst kind of
liar? Yes. She shamelessly writes a trial brief
full of lies and she leaves in the lies that she now cannot
deny she knows are complete lies. She know for sure knows not
only that this witnesses exist but that they are unbiased witnesses
and that Notaro is out of her mind and Gregozek is dirty.
The
police AKA the LAPD on the night of April 12th
2008
Were
police called on the night of April 12 2008
According to the five versions given
by Notaro over 2 years, YES.
The appeals court also says this
happened, and so does a vile Judge named Elizabeth Grimes- when she
throws out a valid lawsuit based on the police coming on this night.
The appeals court takes this a true
even though on September 14 I2009 Martin Boags, city attorney, gets
back documents that show this was all a lie. Still, a month later,
Sievers knowingly lies in her reply brief and she is in trouble as
this Allison Sievers has done a good 100 things by this point that
will get her disbarred, and held civilly liable.
Do
Notaro’s witnesses back up her story that the Police came and
that they saw the police that night?
Yes
When did the police
arrive according to Notaro?
11 P.M after being called by Mark
Flanagan at 9:30 P.M
Did the
police have contact with the Spitzbergs when they arrived?
No, because according to Gregozek,
Notaro and the witnesses( she wrangled up to get her restraining
order- )“ The Spitzbergs had left or were “long gone.” by the
time these police arrived.
Was a 911 call made by
either Flanagan or Griffee?
According to Notaro and them- Yes.
Was
a report made that night- either an official or an incident report?
You’d think. But no no report or
incidence number was made and Julius said that no police ever came.
Did
Gregozek or any other member of the Elite Threat Management Unit,
over the course of the two years, ever try to interview these
fellow cops, or get records of this incident. Did any prosecutor
trying this case ever try to get these records from April 12th
2008?
No on Gregozek or any of that Unit.
Gregozek is a dirty cop, and a consummate liar... just a
miserable thug who's power to destory lives is something that should
concern many people. The resat of his "team" wanted nothing
to do with this case early on. Much evidence to indicate their
rejection of Notaro and this case early on.
Yes on the prosecutors. On Septmember
10th 2009( A YEAR AND A WEEK AFTER THEY FILE THE CHARGE)
when the competency ploy hits a bump, Martin Boags finally
requests this information.
On
September 10 of 2009, a year after the charge is filed, does
the prosecutor, Martin Boags, send a rush order to the Records
department of the LAPD to obtain all records pertaining to this
“Crime,” on April 12th 2008.
Yes.
Did
the police rush back records on September 14th
2009?
Yes.
What did
these records say?
There is absolutely no records related
to this date and place and time etc.
No 911 calls, no cops coming. Never
happened.
Did the
Threat Management Unit have these records in their possession?
Not according to discovery. Only Boags,
a year and a month after the charge is filed decides to check on
this. When he finds out it's a lie the comptency ploy is born.
On
March 4 2010( 7 months after having it confirmed that no police were
called and they were lying ) does the prosecutor, Katie the fraud
Ford, say that the police were called and arrived that night,
in her trial brief.
Yes. She says it as if it is a fact-
despite there being no doubt that it's a lie and her knowing it.
Was
this information buried while Spitzberg and her family went
through 2 years of a malicious prosecution, including a
barbaric competency ploy, 7 illegal and needless search warrants,
and then a month of jail -without any charges?
All exculpatory information was buried
in this case and there had to be PLENTY. The Threat Managemet Unit is
supposed to keep very detailed files and yet they produced nothing,
but acts of retaliation, for an internal affairs complaint made after
months of dealing with the realization that Gregozek and company were
working for Lavely and Singer in this case. Lavely and Singer and
them go way back and they thought we were poor and powerless and they
could get away with it.
From the appeals decision:
On
April 29, 2008, Notaro was driving to perform a show at the Hollywood
Improv club when the
promoter called her to inform her that Spitzberg had
been removed from the club. When Notaro arrived, she saw Spitzberg
outside the club, talking to people. Notaro
entered the club through a side door. The
security guard for the Improv club, Brian Whitaker,
told Notaro that Spitzberg said that she knew where Notaro lived, the
color and make of Notaro's car, and the car's license plate number.
Spitzberg, her mother, and her sister remained outside the front of
the club and verbally attacked other performers, patrons, and
security guards for over two hours. Notaro attempted to leave the
club, but because she felt unsafe, she remained in the club. The
police were called, but they were unable to take any action because
Notaro's life had not been directly threatened. After
the Spitzbergs left, Notaro went home.
Did
Notaro get a phone call before arriving at the Hollywood Improv?
According to
her- yes.
Who made this phone call
to her?
In the police
report the manager of the Improv calls her.. In the affidavit, Notaro
says that a promoter named Lesley Wolf called her , then she says to
the investigator for the public defender that “Management called
her.”Then she say to Boags that a friend called her.
Did Gregozek or any of
his "partners' ever try to question Lesley Wolf, or
the managers or the promoters or the friend (all Notaro versions of
the same phone call) who according to the affidavit to obtain the
restraining order called her that evening.
No. Gregozek and
the prosecution never tried to interview anyone.
Did Spitzberg try to find this
person whomever they may be.
Yes.
Is there a side door at the
Hollywood Improv and does the appellate decision leave out the fact
that Notaro says in her court documents they have in front of them --
that a sherrif by coincidence-- was there, and helped her sneak into
a side door where she then watched “it all from a small window.”
No, there is no
side door at the Hollywood Improv. There is also no small window-
where she could witness that area outside the club. And the sherrif
situation comes later.
Who are Officer
Jaqueline Montalvo and Badar?
They are patrol officers that were
called by Reeta Piazza (on orders of Notaro) to the Improv
comedy club on April 29th 2008.
Did
officer Montalvo, interview Notaro on the night of April 29th
2008 ?
Yes. For a good while.She is the only
police in this whole 2 year ordeal who will ever interview the putrid
Tig Mathilde Notaro.
Did Montalvo and Badar tell the
Spitzbergs to go home because no crime was committed?
Yes.
Did
Alisa Spitzberg try to track them down all through this 2 year
period?
Yes, many times.
How can she prove that?
By emails to the TMU, letter to a
lawyer, and by what she found out at the police station when
she went again to find out if she could talk to these officers.
Did the TMU’s Gregozek
or his ,come and go partner, Hoffman, ever try to talk to Montalvo
and Badar.
Never.
How long did it take for
the prosecutors to find them?
They are first mentioned by name by
Notaro in December of 2009, according to a statement taken by Martin
Boags, Los Angeles city attorney. Boags will be the only one who
makes any investigation. But, he will soon discover that this
invesigation is unearthing only evidence that is grounds for a
dismissal and a huge check to the Spitzbergs and a huge huge apology.
But, that's not what corrupt city attornies do.
As of January 21st
2010 where Montalvo and Badar placed on the
Prosecution’s witness list?
Yes
On February 22nd
2010 was Officer Jaqueline Montalvo
called to court .
Yes.
On
behalf of who was Montalvo going to testify?
THE DEFENSE
Was Montalvo on call to testify
for the defense at trial?
Yes.
Did
Montalvo lose her life in a mysterious car accident on February
25th 2010?
Yes.
Is that
a coincidence?
Sure, I guess.hmmm. sigh. goosebumps.
Did the prosecution drop 4
charges right after Officer Montalvo came in to tell the public
defender that she was a witness for the defense?
Yes
Did they change prosecutors
immediately after Ms. Montalvo came to court?
Yes. Waxler was already taken off
the case for one would guess- too obvous misconduct. Then,
Boags was gone, and now Katie Fraud was on the case. And, when she
lost she would tell the jury that they dropped four charges to
streamline the case -so as not to take up more time for the
jury- and that the judge dismissed the case because of money and it
would cost too much.
She must be disbarred.
April
29th 2008- The
sheriff
Who is
he?
According to Notaro he was there to
witness everything and helped her sneak into a side door.
Did
anyone ever get a hold of this Sherrif that Notaro mentions in
the affidavit to get the restraining order. No
Did
Spitzberg try to get a hold of this Sherriff after hearing about
this?
Yes. But, she was stonewalled on every
occasion where she sought help from law enforcement.
Did the TMU ,who were
“investigating” this case ever try to talk to this Sherriff?
No. They never tried to talk to anyone
according to discovery and files. But, in the end they spend a
fortune on 7 illegal search warrants , extremely expensive comptency
ploys, 30 days of illegal incarceration, and all these goons caused a
needless baseless farcical 12 day trial.
They lost at trial - which is truly
huge- because they had a malicous army and I had no one. truly. on my
side.
Looong fascinating chapter of the
story- the lawyers I had throughout.
I was even denied my chance to
impeach the witnesses ,and yet they still lost. Huge, I'm told.
HUGE.
But, a very hollow victory, and too
much work must be done to make things right.
Why
didn’t the sheriff do anything to help Notaro that night- and Why
call the police when Notaro say the sherrif is there already and on
the case?
I guess
according to Notaro the Sheriff needed backup.
Why didn't he come to testify or even call Gregozek ,after
Montalvo and Badar weren't going to testify for "their side?
Because the Sherrif doesn’t
exist, people.
1 comment:
Appreciate this blogg post
Post a Comment