Saturday, December 5, 2015

I wish I could write about Lavely and Singer and The LAPD's Threat Management with such composure

Was curious about what happened to Anthony Pellicano, so did a little googling this morning, and look what I found.

Korrupt judge, Karla Kerlin might find it interesting, since she has an interesting history with Anthony Pellicano, Lavely and Singer, and the TMU.

I was one of the nobodies that was railroaded by the TMU (see below for context) but in my case... it was a foiled railroading, since by luck, I got a judge that wasn't on the take. I never would argue that I'm a nobody, and I became aware early on in this case, that I was seen as a gnat... But I am the gnat that roared so....

Written by a blogger who I'd love to meet. Unfortunately, he (or she) stopped with two posts.

Deposition in Francis Shivers restraining order abuse case sheds light on Threat Management Unit

When I decided to start a blog, last week, I did so with the desire to talk of some of the corruption I witnessed as  a court insider who had seen and heard enough.  Little did I know that I’d uncover a Pandora’s box.
A recent tip given me by a litigant (unrelated to my work,) really intrigued me. This individual sent me a link to a deposition and I read it with some interest. It is a deposition of an LAPD Detective by the name Jose Viramontes. Detective Viramontes works as a detective for the world famous Threat Management Unit, or TMU.

  I had often heard rumors of this unit. Yet, the rumors became persistent enough to inspire my interest only recently. There were rumors of this unit misappropriating tax payer monies and federal funding, as a means to keep their cushy positions as “defenders to the stars.”   Discussion of them railroading “nobodies,” seemed too farfetched. There was talk of pay offs and perks. I simply couldn’t believe it.  When I heard that Detective Martha Defoe had not only retired at the age of forty four, but that her husband, Scott Defoe, had worked regularly for CBS as an actor I began looking into this unit.

Sadly, it appears that the rumors of this Unit’s highly questionable approach to law enforcement are well founded. By all indications, the LAPD’s Threat Management has functioned as the law enforcement arm of Martin Singer’s growing empire.  I am guessing that after Anthony Pellicano was sent to federal prison, celebrities, and their lawyers, had to look elsewhere to close such high stakes deals.
Please refer to my last post for some perspective on Martin Singer and his lawfirm, Lavely and Singer. In other words, Viramontes, Martha Defoe, and a  Jim Gregozek. are working under the guise of public servants.

However, the reality is that they are not acting as public servants at all. Rather, these sworn officers are working to assure that Mr. Singer is able to sell his 800 dollar an hour services to desperate and very well compensated celebrities. I have information that convinces me that other TMU detectives are involved, as are Detectives from the Hollywood Division, but I’ll save that until more evidence is presented me.

When such celebrities fear that their reputation is worth millions, and that the multi millions are at risk, it isn’t hard to imagine that a few hundred thousand dollars in retainer fees is a wise investment when trying to insure their brand.  Enter Martin Singer and those of similar dispositions.
 Clearly, this occurred with the super wealthy actress Pauley Perrette.  And, as history has shown, her investment in one of the top entertainment lawyers(Ronald Lisk) was a wise one. She is thriving with even concrete proof of perjury made available to the public record.

Do read this depo. It is both frightening and enlightening. It appears that the LAPD’s Consent Decree needs to be re-evaluated.

Marty Singer and the Pelican. Anthony Pellicanno lives on through Randy Mehringer and Marty Singer of famed Lavely and Singer

If observers of the Los Angeles legal system think that a fifteen year prison sentence put P.I. to the stars, Anthony Pellicano, behind bars, and out of commission — they better think twice.
It appears that Martin Singer’s impressive win rate is not being affected by Pellicanno’s  fifteen year federal prison sentence. Mr. Singer appears to win nearly every single case he is hired for. It doesn’t hurt that Judge Michael Johnson often presides when big celebrity names are present, and that adversarial parties risk loss of privacy and death threats if they have to wrangle with Marty and Tony. Recent tips have led me to believe that even more serious dirty tactics are being used in order to ensure Lavely and Singer’s reign over LA law continues.

And, Tony P, knows how to send a message in style. No one is going to put the Pelican out to pasture.
When Tiffany Tendra didn’t want her reputation tarnished by a documentary entitled, ” Go Go Girl,”  she hired the top guns at this Century City law firm.  The brains behind this “boutique” operation belong to attorney, Martin Singer.
Mr. Singer represents big named stars such as Arnold Shwartzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Tiger Woods, Demi Moore, and Kimberly Kardashian of Kardashian family fame. That is but a small sample of the clients that attorneys for the firm have represented throughout the years.

Mr. Singer is now charging 800 dollars PER HOUR. For that kind of cash, you better believe you’ll get service. If service entails getting bad cops on board– so be it. As Charlie Sheen(another satisified Marty Singer client,) recently made clear… WINNING is everything.
Shortly after Tendra was able to hire  these legal eagles, two disgraced LAPD applicants  Randy Mehringer, and Mark Buchanan of  Los Angeles’s Solution group LLC  had a GPS device inserted on the bottom of filmmaker Sue May’s car.  Ms. May’s elderly mother also was stalked and harassed.
“Randy” was written on the device to leave no doubt that Randy Mehringer was the engineer of this particular operation. But, not the General. The GPS device was placed in a Pelican container.  A chilling nod from Singer and the Pelican that just because A.P is behind bars, doesn’t mean he isn’t there to protect the stars.

As evidenced by Marty’s ability to buy off  bad cops, Mark Arneson, and members of the LAPD’s Threat Management Unit L.A Justice can be bought if you have 800 dollars an hour to spare.  The rewards are high and the risks small. Only Arneson has been held to task, as of this date.
 Another win for Marty and the Pelican. Another loss for due process and such.

Here's just one bit of COMPELLING evidence in my case that John Gregozek was working for Marty Singer(whose services were paid by Billionaire Nick Kroll.)

From the moment Nick Kroll and Marty Singer hooked "Tig" Notaro up with Gregozek, there was no justice to be had... And, these frauds and crimes would open the door for Notaro(again, with the help of Nick Kroll) to start one of the most profitable and well publicized cancer scams in history.

Amazing that I didn't put this together,till yesterday.

My sister and I have put a lot together, but it didn't occur to me how I'd prove that John Gregozek was in on it, from the very beginning.

John Gregozek said to my mother, "what can I do. You sued her (Notaro) didn't you?" as the only answer to her question. Her question was, "You were in my house. You know that this girl is lying. How could you have tried to press criminal charges." He said that in October of 08.

So we understood, that as of October of 2008, the criminal charges were retaliation for the civil suit I'd filed against Notaro. By then we knew too that John Gregozek was acting an errand boy for Allison Hart of Lavely and Singer.

Back then though, we were completely ignorant of Nick Kroll, other than the fact that Tig Notaro had listed him as a key witness to events that never transpired. (And, he was never even there, we'd find out.)

We had no idea about  his role in this conspiracy(and it sure was a conspiracy, folks. The c word has gotten a bad rap, but it just means more than one was involved, and in this case- there were many who conspired to make sure I didn't win any civil suits etc.)

Until now,we knew there was something very very wrong with Detective John Gregozek.

John Gregozek -what a lovely innocent face. who would guess... SARCASM!

 Knew he wasn't working for the public. Knew he was willing to lie repeatedly. Willing to press for bogus criminal charges. Willing to lie under penalty of perjury, many times. And, willing to lie under oath in court... I also knew he was willing to hide exculpatory evidence and falsify police arrivals at scenes and then to actually to falsify an incident report number, when he submitted his reports or search warrant affidavits. Willing to waste a broke city's money so he could secure a job, if he pleased Lavely and Singer and Jules Kroll(through his son, Nick)

But, till yesterday, I did not get that this was his intention from day one.  That he wanted me to be charged with crimes, on day one.    I didn't get that the fix was completely in from the first time he was told by Nick Kroll to take care of Nick Kroll's, "best and oldest comedy friends, "Tig" Notaro.

How can I prove that Gregozek had no plausible deniability, and that he intended to railroad me from the start? ( with the blessing of his supervisor, Jeffrey Dunn)

Please look at this, Note how despite this allegation about April 7th 2008, no police were called or arrived. And, so Gregozek is going by Tig Notaro's word alone.

Note that this was redacted. I have the non redacted one and will post when I find but note one witness is included and it was Stef Willen.  But, then on 8/14/08 this info was Rejected. Note that if the report was valid it would include all the wintesses or even a few. and all the related badge numbers and police report and incident number.

Then, please look at this ugly little document -

Please look carefully at the paragraphs that start with  "On April 12th 2008," and "April 29th 2008"
Had John Gregozek really investigated all these allegations -- Every ONE-- would be shown to be a lie. Note the presence of Nick Kroll. He was not even there. It's all a lie.

No evidence then and never was there any evidence. Not even the pretense of any evidence which begs a lot of questions.
 Let's forget for the moment that this document followed absolutely no investigation on the part of Gregozek, or anyone. Let's forget that all this is the words of Tig Notaro and Stef Willen given "via phone" and  written as gospel truth by Gregozek. Long after Gregozek(and other members of the police and prosecutors) knew that every word was a lie they just were arrogant enough or emboldened enough to keep repeating these lies. If any of the things written about me or my sister were true, not only would we two super creeps, but I would not have all seven charges dismissed after a twelve day trial and two years of prosecution.  Five witnesses who were as unbiased as possible(total strangers) were ready to testify that everything in that report was a lie, but the judge agreed to the prosecution's pleas that none could come in since uh.... it would take too long. So though my judge was much better than most, he did subvert justice by allowing this clearly malicious prosecution to not allow the defense a "collaterally attack to the validity of the restraining order".

Also, please note that after the real police found Notaro uncredible, Nick Kroll hooked her up with Lavely and Singer and John Gregozek. John Gregozek wanted the kind of opportunities the former head of the TMU had... Gregory Boles was that guy and now he has a very glamorous position working for Kroll Inc.

For now, let's focus on the last two lines of April 12th and April 29th 2008 

On April 12 2008...The police were called but Spitzer(sic) had left before they arrived.

On April 29 2008.... Police called and arrived at the scene. Officers arrived at the scene and determined there was no crime. (incident 080430005196)

Re: April 12h 2008 - The police were called and arrived?

Not only is it strange that there is no names of the officers listed but there is no time frame and there is no badge numbers.
There is no mention of a 911 call, and there is no incident or police report number listed.

Then, if the allegations in this report made by John Gregozek, are true-- the police would surely visit us. We lived less than 2 miles away, and Notaro knew that through Stef Willen. She knew exactly where we lived. It also doesn't note who called the police. (Later,Allison Hart would write to the appeals judges that not only were police called but me and my sister were present when they arrived. Then zero detail about the next step in that type of situation i.e what steps these cops took)

Over the two years that this prosecution lasted, not once did anyone but us try to check on this information. We tried but were told we weren't legally entitled to that information????!!!!! We didn't know better so we believed this to be the case. Until September of 2009 no prosecutor tried to get their hands on this info.

Re: April 29 2008- Police called and arrived at the scene. Officers arrived at the scene and determined there was no crime. Then, an incident number.

So, why not the officers names and badge numbers? Again, as hard as I tried, no one would give me this information. Very late in... Gregozek ponied up the names, and after that he'd begin to include their names and badge number in his perjured search warrants.

(Their names were Jaqueline Montalvo and Jannelle Badar. Montalvo would come in on February 23rd 2010 to tell Alissa Malzman and Martin Boags(the prosecutor at that time. he was taken off soon after) that though the prosecutors had her on their witness list she'd be a witness for the defense AKA me. Three days later she was dead in an unusual car accident.)

Where is the incidence report?

Well, as Jaqueline Montalvo knew... there wasn't any. She'd so dismissed Notaro's allegations, that night, that she did not write any police or incident report. Same for Janell Badar.

In August of 2009( a year after the charge was filed) Martin Boags, was appointed to the case after three other prosecutors had left(why? we don't know but we have our suspicions) We'd learn later that someone forgot to tell him a lot of info and then we'd learn he ordered this to add more charges, as a means to terrorize me into a plea bargain. Anyway, Boags did order the records of both dates:

Add caption
Please note that Bill Bratton aside of his "public service" position was(and still is, as far as I know)  an employee of Kroll Inc. This is why their was non stop and very obvious crimes committed in this case, and no one would do anything.

It becomes beyond curious if you regard the minutes. This is a newer one but I'll find the money that has no mention of the illegal arrest a year and a half later. That one says that I was arrested on April 29th 2008. We know that didn't happen. Gregozek's report doesn't say that happened. The official records ordered by Martin Boags say it didn't happen. Why is that there and why wouldn't anyone correct this? Not Franica Tawn, Not Anan Desai, Not Alissa Malzman. Not the two private lawyers.No prosecutors?

In short, JOHN GREGOZEK PUT A FAKE POLICE INCIDENT NUMBER ON THE REPORT HE"D SUBMIT THROUGHOUT!!! AND, he knew there were no police on April 12th 2008. He'd checked. Of course he did. Otherwise he'd put a real number. But he knew that the only way to make this get a city attorney on board, is to lie like this. 
Landin let me out on my own recognizance. Which is more that fair. But this becomes very significant when Judge Maria Strattons states on the record that I am facing very serious charges and therefore she would deny me any bail for 31 months. Then, she make it 10k ... which makes no sense.

Post a Comment

Stef Willen's Disaster, Literally.

In the history of publishing, there is a fascinating history of memoirs that get pulled from publication, after an eagle eyed reader or rea...